Helmet or No Helmet

[racedoll]

Originally Posted by tached1000rr

Legal or not I just could not bring myself to ride without a helmet

How do you feel about this?

Do you think insurance rates would be lower (or are lower) if states made them mandatory?

[Homeslice]

Insurance companies aren't going to drop rates out of the goodness of their heart.

They should, however, RAISE the rates of anyone caught without a helmet on the police report.

[TYEster]

Would be? Doubt it. Should be, more like it.

And no I still wouldn't ride without one. My only exception is if I just finished some minor work on the bike and I need to see if it's operating correctly and I just pull onto my neighborhood street.

Most of the time I don't even get away with that if my garage helper is around.

[Particle Man]

Not even an option in my mind (which I'd like to keep from being splattered on the street).

[Adeptus_Minor]

I don't know, but rates should definitely be lower for people who voluntarily wear them.
Yeah yeah, I know... how can you prove something like that?
It's kind of like companies that offer healthy lifestyle insurance incentives.
They have people sign a sworn statement that they'll maintain the conditions of the program and after that you have to just take them at their word.
I can't really see insurance companies willingly giving customers a discount based on good faith.

[CrazyKell]

Mandatory helmets up here and let me tell you about our rates....through the roof!

[101lifts2]

Originally Posted by CrazyKell

Mandatory helmets up here and let me tell you about our rates....through the roof!

Must be the healthcare. lol

[askmrjesus]

I trust insurance companies as far as I can comfortably spit a rat, which is to say, not very far.

However, I do not believe in mandatory helmet, or seat belt laws, for anyone over he age of 21. It's your head, do with it what you will. If you've come to the conclusion that you're invincible, go for it.

Insurance companies charge higher premiums for young drivers, old drivers, smokers, and other "high risk" groups. I don't agree with all of their reasoning, but if you're not smart enough to wear a helmet, that's on you.

In short, I believe in charging people based on their own decisions.

JC

[Mikey]

Originally Posted by askmrjesus

I trust insurance companies as far as I can comfortably spit a rat, which is to say, not very far.

However, I do not believe in mandatory helmet, or seat belt laws, for anyone over he age of 21. It's your head, do with it what you will. If you've come to the conclusion that you're invincible, go for it.

Insurance companies charge higher premiums for young drivers, old drivers, smokers, and other "high risk" groups. I don't agree with all of their reasoning, but if you're not smart enough to wear a helmet, that's on you.

In short, I believe in charging people based on their own decisions.

JC

This.

I wear a helmet 100% of the time I am on a bike, as do all my passengers. That will always be so, helmet law or no helmet law.

Still, I do so because I choose to, not because the government tells me to. I strongly oppose helmet laws, seatbelt laws, and all other nanny state "this is for your own protetion" laws.

[azoomm]

Originally Posted by askmrjesus

I trust insurance companies as far as I can comfortably spit a rat, which is to say, not very far.

However, I do not believe in mandatory helmet, or seat belt laws, for anyone over he age of 21. It's your head, do with it what you will. If you've come to the conclusion that you're invincible, go for it.

Insurance companies charge higher premiums for young drivers, old drivers, smokers, and other "high risk" groups. I don't agree with all of their reasoning, but if you're not smart enough to wear a helmet, that's on you.

In short, I believe in charging people based on their own decisions.

JC