Firefighters let home burn

[goof2]

Originally Posted by Kaneman

They should've saved the house, seized it, sold it at auction, distributed the money to citizens of the city who DO pay the fee...and then raped the family to make sure they were properly punished for their mistakes and stupid decisions.

It has nothing to do with punishment as you sure seem to believe, it is all about consequences. I'd certainly like this story a whole lot more if the guy didn't pay and his house never caught on fire.

[Kaneman]

Originally Posted by goof2

It has nothing to do with punishment as you sure seem to believe, it is all about consequences. I'd certainly like this story a whole lot more if the guy didn't pay and his house never caught on fire.

I say its a fine line. If the county can profit from the home burning then they should. Yet, we need to make sure enough fear is instilled into the rest of the county so that they never forget to pay their fee. My way accomplishes both these things.

Rape Burn 2012.

[goof2]

Originally Posted by Kaneman

I say its a fine line. If the county can profit from the home burning then they should. Yet, we need to make sure enough fear is instilled into the rest of the county so that they never forget to pay their fee. My way accomplishes both these things.

Rape Burn 2012.

There is nothing fine about it. I don't care about making sure people in this community remember, forget, or decline to pay for fire service. That is still their decision and I wish none of them any ill will regardless of their choice.

I have an alternative suggestion. How about homeowners decide to pay for the services they want and not pay for the services they don't and everyone doesn't bitch and moan if those choices catch up with a homeowner. Obviously this is less than ideal but would you prefer the previous system where this part of the community had no access to fire service at any price?

[CrazyKell]

I don't know what's funnier. Kaneman's suggestions or Goof2 trying to logically argue with him.

[Mikey]

Originally Posted by CrazyKell

I don't know what's funnier. Kaneman's suggestions or Goof2 trying to logically argue with him.

Obvious troll is obvious.

[goof2]

I'm bored so I'll go along.

[Kaneman]

Originally Posted by Mikey

Obvious troll is obvious.

Obviously obvious.

Though there is a certain seriousness in the absurdity behind advocating burning a man's house down while you rape his family in front of him....as you and goof are suggesting.

For shame.

[Mikey]

Originally Posted by Kaneman

Obviously obvious.

Though there is a certain seriousness in the absurdity behind advocating burning a man's house down while you rape his family in front of him....as you and goof are suggesting.

For shame.

I don't remember suggesting any such thing. Unless, of course, the man "forgot" to pay his rape insurance too.

[goof2]

Originally Posted by Kaneman

Obviously obvious.

Though there is a certain seriousness in the absurdity behind advocating burning a man's house down while you rape his family in front of him....as you and goof are suggesting.

For shame.

I understand the trolling aspect, but i think behind the rediculousness suggested in your posts you still believe there was a failure on the part of the fire department. I'll continue to argue that even if you obfuscate your point in the absurd.

[Kaneman]

Originally Posted by goof2

I understand the trolling aspect, but i think behind the rediculousness suggested in your posts you still believe there was a failure on the part of the fire department. I'll continue to argue that even if you obfuscate your point in the absurd.

No, not at all. In fact, I previously suggested we award them medals for being such outstanding citizens and having the fortitude to stand there and watch the home burn.