10-07-2008, 01:15 AM | #1 |
too much time on my hands
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: the northern district of god damn
Moto: 01 ZX6R, looking for more now.
Posts: 1,802
|
wet vs dry clutch whats the difference?
I know the wet clutch is basically soaked in oil all its life, where the dry clutch isnt, but other than that, whats the difference/advantage of one over the other?
|
10-07-2008, 01:19 AM | #2 |
⎷⎛⎝ ⎝⏠⏝⏠⎠ ⎷⎛⎝
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: ⎷⎛⎝ ⎝⏠⏝⏠⎠ ⎷⎛⎝
Moto: ⎷⎛⎝ ⎝⏠⏝⏠⎠ ⎷⎛⎝
Posts: 990
|
A dry clutch allows you to be arrogant about your italian exotica to people who innocently ask why your bike sounds like the engine is shattering.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ebgJJRWLzMI
__________________
Last edited by PiZdETS; 10-07-2008 at 01:24 AM.. |
10-07-2008, 09:00 AM | #3 | |
DefenderOfTheBuelliverse
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Parts Unknown
Moto: Buell XB12R
Posts: 18,585
|
Loud clutches save lives.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
10-07-2008, 09:02 AM | #4 |
Moto GP Star
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 12,156
|
Loud clutches are expensive....
|
10-07-2008, 12:31 PM | #5 | |
Forum Coach
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: GA
Moto: 2006 GSXR 600
Posts: 7,419
|
Quote:
the rattle and whir are completely enthralling... |
|
10-07-2008, 01:53 PM | #6 |
Jesus Christ!
Join Date: Jul 2008
Moto: (The Chi's lover)
Posts: 801
|
I would have to think that the loss of friction and HP of spinning an oil bathed clutch has something to do with it. But with there TQ numbers this can't be the main reason for the switch. Maybe oil contaminatin also?
__________________
FTP |
10-07-2008, 02:16 PM | #7 |
Let go of my ears.
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Moto: '03 GSX-R600, '04 625SMC
Posts: 1,394
|
"Wet" Clutches are more consistent in operation and have a longer service life due to a more consistent operating temperature, however they have more tendency to slip due to the fluid they are in, thus they require more friction plates. This causes a greater parasitic loss through the clutch due to the resistence of the fluid and the increased mass of more plates. Dry clutches are pretty much the opposite, they are not as consistent and they don't last as long, but they cause less parasitic loss because of fewer plates and less rotating resistence.
__________________
Entia non sunt multiplicanda necessitatem |
10-07-2008, 02:22 PM | #8 | |
Moto GP Star
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 12,156
|
Quote:
|
|
10-07-2008, 02:32 PM | #9 |
Let go of my ears.
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Moto: '03 GSX-R600, '04 625SMC
Posts: 1,394
|
Oh, I also forgot, dry clutches shed heat more effectively (into air rather than into hot oil) which causes less plate expansion. As wet clutch plates expand they shed material due to friction which will get into the oil and can cause premature wear to bearings and other parts in the engine. Also, due to the oncreased number of plates necessary a wet clutch requires a harder "pull" in order to engage and disengage.
__________________
Entia non sunt multiplicanda necessitatem |
10-07-2008, 02:34 PM | #10 | |
Moto GP Star
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 12,156
|
Quote:
|
|
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|