Tigger's boinking a squidette

[Rider]

Originally Posted by Krabill

The last "public" ride I organized had a guy on a GSXR1000 show up. I was on my KLR with the same knobbies you see on my WR.

I was leading . . . the GSXR was right behind me . . . let's see how that one turned out . . .


I hate to be the one to bring it up . . . but it ain't the bike

Well I see the problem, it was those huge ass bar ends that fucked him up.

[Amber Lamps]

Originally Posted by Yamerhaw

i'm all for tigger's woman wearing those shorts to ride...as long as i was riding behind them

I used to date a stripper that almost always wore a mini skirt riding... guess how many of those rides I ended up leading!

[Amber Lamps]

Originally Posted by Rider

That's awesome. I need to get one. I use Google Earth a lot for work to create custom map displays.

That reminds me, have you tried "Virtual Earth" yet? It does 3d mapping, etc. It's pretty cool although I think that GE has a few more features.

[Amber Lamps]

Originally Posted by Krabill

The last "public" ride I organized had a guy on a GSXR1000 show up. I was on my KLR with the same knobbies you see on my WR.

I was leading . . . the GSXR was right behind me . . . let's see how that one turned out . . .







I hate to be the one to bring it up . . . but it ain't the bike

You caused a guy to crash a GSXR1000 riding a 250 4 stroke? Well obviously your friends suck at riding! I mean really what a turd! What was he thinking about his next double cheese burger and ran off the road? Jesus talk about a non-curve!

[Rider]

Originally Posted by TIGGER

That reminds me, have you tried "Virtual Earth" yet? It does 3d mapping, etc. It's pretty cool although I think that GE has a few more features.

I don't really need the 3d mapping but what I do need is the ability to place objects at any given lat/long and elevation. What I do is create the map objects to test that the displays are displaying the correct symbols in the correct location. Since I'm not actually flying the plane, I have to simulate the data that the displays use for identifiers(waypoints, navaids, contacts, geometries.....).

[Amber Lamps]

Originally Posted by Rider

Well I see the problem, it was those huge ass bar ends that fucked him up.

Seriously, it was either that or his gut got in the way of his handlebars!

[Krabill]

Well . . I was riding my KLR650 at the time. Brakes are horrible on that thing. It's the green monster in the 2nd picture.

Same knobbies as I'm running now, though.

Believe it or not, the 250 runs the twisties better than the KLR650 did.

And yeah . . . he sucked

[Krabill]

Originally Posted by TIGGER

Seriously, it was either that or his gut got in the way of his handlebars!

The GSXR rider isn't in any of the pictures. He was still layed out in the ditch. He was a skinny dude. The bigger guys pushing his bike didn't have any problems.

[Amber Lamps]

Originally Posted by Rider

I don't really need the 3d mapping but what I do need is the ability to place objects at any given lat/long and elevation. What I do is create the map objects to test that the displays are displaying the correct symbols in the correct location. Since I'm not actually flying the plane, I have to simulate the data that the displays use for identifiers(waypoints, navaids, contacts, geometries.....).

Oh... gee wilikers Ed but you're smart!

[Amber Lamps]

Originally Posted by Krabill

Well . . I was riding my KLR650 at the time. Brakes are horrible on that thing. It's the green monster in the 2nd picture.

Same knobbies as I'm running now, though.

Believe it or not, the 250 runs the twisties better than the KLR650 did.

And yeah . . . he sucked

Well here's something we can agree on! I mean judging by the lack of damage to his bike, he couldn't have been doing over what 40, maybe 50 mph? I can't see the entire curve but that got to be 80+ curve at least, right?