07-17-2009, 02:18 PM | #11 | |
Serious Business
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: New York
Moto: 1993 ZX-11 2008 CBR1000rr
Posts: 9,723
|
Quote:
Yup |
|
07-17-2009, 03:14 PM | #12 | |
Letzroll
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Lake Norman area, NC
Moto: 07 Red R1 & 07 Blue R6
Posts: 5,265
|
Quote:
It's not like I'm a ZX9 cheerleader I mean I do own an R1 now and it's my 2nd one. Oh yeah...the R1 looked better no doubt. |
|
07-17-2009, 03:28 PM | #13 |
sergeant hatred
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Ottawa
Moto: The bus
Posts: 2,723
|
ALthough, I never thought the ZXs of that era were ugly(I think they look better than the new ones*), this statement is 100% correct
*04-05 ZX10s excepted
__________________
My wife was afraid of the dark...then she saw me naked and now she's afraid of the light. |
07-17-2009, 04:13 PM | #14 |
cruiser
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: on the run
Moto: '09 HD superglide, 16 Yamaha FZ 09
Posts: 2,749
|
i have never ridden a zx9 but I thought it was considered piggish for weight. actual weights are always close with sportbikes but I thought it was the way it carried it's weight that made people shy away from it?
|
07-17-2009, 04:52 PM | #15 |
Elitist
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: SF Bay Area
Moto: Gix 750
Posts: 11,351
|
It was that lame shovel-shaped headlight that killed it
|
07-17-2009, 05:27 PM | #16 | |
Letzroll
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Lake Norman area, NC
Moto: 07 Red R1 & 07 Blue R6
Posts: 5,265
|
Quote:
In 1998 it wasn't lighter than the R1 but was a lot closer. |
|
Bookmarks |
|
|