Go Back   Two Wheel Fix > Riding > Street

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-22-2009, 01:45 PM   #31
Dave
Chaotic Neutral
 
Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Cherry Hill NJ
Moto: GV1200 Madura, Hawk gt
Posts: 13,992
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TIGGER View Post
Nope maximum sweetness!!!



Haha!



step through = scooter bro
__________________
TWF Post whore #6
Dave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2009, 02:21 PM   #32
Amber Lamps
Moto GP Star
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 14,556
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave View Post
step through = scooter bro
Semantics... I'd rock a 200 mph scooter!

Last edited by Amber Lamps; 08-22-2009 at 02:32 PM..
Amber Lamps is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2009, 02:31 PM   #33
Amber Lamps
Moto GP Star
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 14,556
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by smileyman View Post
I pondered this alot while mowing last night. I do not think we have seen the end of the curve but I feel its coming. Big HP for the existing liters will have to come either from new tech' like D.I. 2 strokes, valve actuation, or metallurgy. Otherwise durability will suffer. You may have to replace valves rather than have tham adjusted at 25K?
The only other way to get there is adding CCs ala the new V Max. GSXR 1800 anyone?
Hmmm... I don't know. I still stand behind my original statement that Suzuki could produce a 200hp GSXR1000 if they wanted to. Today. I also believe that it would be reliable. I point to 10 years of Suzuki dominance in Superstock racing around the world. I do believe that we are losing our spot lately.... I also believe that we have had no small success in Endurance racing as well. I honestly don't believe that it's that "hard" to make the bike and have it be reliable. I believe that there are other considerations at work here, i.e. legal, environmental, image, tires, safety, etc. Shit, there are many groups right now who believe that the current bikes have way too much power and want to legislate a maximum performance limit.
Amber Lamps is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2009, 03:28 PM   #34
Mr Lefty
TWFix Legend
 
Mr Lefty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Denver CO
Moto: 01 BMW F650GS Dakar
Posts: 15,677
Default

not to mention if they blow their load on hp right now... it'll get harder to improve on... so they pace themselves... and give us little gains to keep us happy and away from other manufactures...
Mr Lefty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2009, 05:16 PM   #35
Tmall
Aspiring Rapper
 
Tmall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Halifax, NS
Moto: '12 CB1000R
Posts: 3,569
Default

I think the next big thing is going to be downforce incorporated into the body work.

They'll make it lighter to help accelerate, then have downforce to stick it to the ground.
Tmall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2009, 05:34 PM   #36
Antwanny
WERA White Plate
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,047
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by No Worries View Post
Maybe they should graph how the midrange torque has decreased as the horsepower and rpm range has increased. I use midrange torque dozens of times a day. High rpm horsepower? Once a day if I'm lucky.
agreed but when you use the horsepower its too much fun
Antwanny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2009, 08:45 PM   #37
smileyman
White Trash Hero
 
smileyman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: NW Arkansas
Moto: Buell 1125R Porco Rosso Edition
Posts: 4,895
Default

Yeah 200 hp is doable with what they have now. I just dont think that is very high since WSBK is around that figure reliably now. But say GP levels at 1000cc, 240 hp in a warranty and EPA/dot package would run about as spensive as the Desmodici. Tigger is right can be done. Probably wont though...
__________________

Arkriders.com
To be the best you must first be willing to risk the worst!
smileyman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2009, 11:04 AM   #38
karl_1052
sergeant hatred
 
karl_1052's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Ottawa
Moto: The bus
Posts: 2,723
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TIGGER View Post
I'm not sure you're right there, NW. I'm sure that my bike has more torque than yours. Although I do agree that torque has hit a wall since my 1997 YZF1000 had about the same torque numbers as my 2006 GSXR1000 does. For some reason, and it may be on purpose,torque has hovered around 80 ft/lbs in the liter class. It may be that tires aren't good enough for much more than that... You have to remember that whenever the OEMs have produced an engine that was "better" than the corresponding brakes, suspension and tires pandemonium has followed!!!
Torque is a function of engine capacity and engine efficiency. The only way to increase torque is to increase engine size.

HP is a function of torque at a specific rpm. Raise the RPM capacity and the HP goes up, but torque will always be the same.

My bike makes 80lb-ft from about 3000 rpm to over 10000rpm, with a peak of just over 100lb-ft at around 8000rpm. All due to the long stroke motor with an additional 340cc over a liter.
__________________
My wife was afraid of the dark...then she saw me naked and now she's afraid of the light.
karl_1052 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2009, 12:34 PM   #39
Dave
Chaotic Neutral
 
Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Cherry Hill NJ
Moto: GV1200 Madura, Hawk gt
Posts: 13,992
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by karl_1052 View Post
Torque is a function of engine capacity and engine efficiency. The only way to increase torque is to increase breathing capacity.

HP is a function of torque at a specific rpm. Raise the RPM capacity and the HP goes up, but torque will always be the same.

My bike makes 80lb-ft from about 3000 rpm to over 10000rpm, with a peak of just over 100lb-ft at around 8000rpm. All due to the long stroke motor with an additional 340cc over a liter.
fixed
__________________
TWF Post whore #6
Dave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2009, 01:24 PM   #40
karl_1052
sergeant hatred
 
karl_1052's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Ottawa
Moto: The bus
Posts: 2,723
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave View Post
fixed
But with a given capacity, cylinder filling can only be so efficient, unless there is a giant leap forward in breathing technology. The only other way is a bigger cylinder.
__________________
My wife was afraid of the dark...then she saw me naked and now she's afraid of the light.
karl_1052 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:37 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.