Beretta M9A1 vs 92FS - Page 3

Cutty72 · 01-23-2010, 02:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by marko138

Sig?

Sig would be good, but probably not "cheap" enough for gov issue.

Thinking they would go glock or maybe S&W.

Cutty72 · 01-23-2010, 02:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave

never failed on me. perhaps you suck on maintenance?

I haven't had one really fail, a few misfeeds and jams, nothing a slap and pull didn't cure. It's just a bulky clumsy pistol. It only fits comfortably to those with large hands. Really not the best choice for a issue weapon.

Dave · 01-23-2010, 03:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cutty72

Sig would be good, but probably not "cheap" enough for gov issue.

Thinking they would go glock or maybe S&W.

m11 is a sig. That you for beautifully illustaring my point about the m9a1 though

Cutty72 · 01-23-2010, 03:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave

m11 is a sig. That you for beautifully illustaring my point about the m9a1 though

have never seen or handled the m11.

and you are welcome.

Rangerscott · 01-23-2010, 06:01 PM

These any good?

http://www.sigsauer.com/upFiles/CmsC...ebateForm2.pdf

Dave · 01-26-2010, 03:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cutty72

have never seen or handled the m11.

and you are welcome.

again, exactly

Captain Morgan · 01-27-2010, 08:03 PM

I've shot the 92FS and hated it. Too heavy, too clumsy, just not what I imagined. Loved the looks of it, but that was all.

ericr · 01-27-2010, 09:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Triple

Anyone have experience with the 92's little brother, the 84FS Cheetah?

Looks like a better piece for carry than the 92FS. I'd prefer it in stainless (not available) over nickel, and with black grips (easily swapped). 380 ACP ammo seems to be a bit pricier than standard 9mm, however...

The 84 Cheeta really isn't great for a carry gun. It's almost as thick as the 92, just a little shorter in length and height. I bought a used one cheap just to have it and it shoots good, but yeah ammo is more than a 9mm so I wouldn't recommend it. They do have a single stack mag version (can't remember the model) and it is nice and thin and would make a good carry gun if you want a small caliber but again there are smaller ones out there.

Dave · 01-27-2010, 09:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Triple

Anyone have experience with the 92's little brother, the 84FS Cheetah?

Looks like a better piece for carry than the 92FS. I'd prefer it in stainless (not available) over nickel, and with black grips (easily swapped). 380 ACP ammo seems to be a bit pricier than standard 9mm, however...

try looking for an old cougar

Hydrant · 01-27-2010, 11:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Triple

Anyone have experience with the 92's little brother, the 84FS Cheetah?

Looks like a better piece for carry than the 92FS. I'd prefer it in stainless (not available) over nickel, and with black grips (easily swapped). 380 ACP ammo seems to be a bit pricier than standard 9mm, however...

Also, think about ammo availability. Around here .380 is nearly impossible to find, and if you do its about $25 a box.

01-23-2010, 06:01 PM	#25
Rangerscott Viff6N Mutated Warrior Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Texas Moto: '01 Honda VFR 800 & '09 ER-6N Posts: 8,704	These any good? http://www.sigsauer.com/upFiles/CmsC...ebateForm2.pdf

01-27-2010, 08:03 PM	#27
Captain Morgan Let's do another U-turn Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Indiana Moto: 2009 V-Strom Posts: 3,816	I've shot the 92FS and hated it. Too heavy, too clumsy, just not what I imagined. Loved the looks of it, but that was all.